Intracoronary 17 beta-estradiol converted acetylcholine-induced coronary constriction to dilatation in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease (P<0.01), but had no effect in men.
28 postmenopausal women and men with proven coronary artery disease undergoing intracoronary physiological testing.
17 beta-estradiol vs Placebo (2.5 micrograms)
Changes in coronary artery diameter and coronary blood flow after intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine, p=<.01
p-value: p=<.01
BACKGROUND: Women are protected from coronary artery disease until the menopause. Ovarian hormones are vasoactive substances that influence both hemodynamic parameters and atheroma formation. Intravenous ethinyl estradiol has been shown to reverse acetylcholine-induced vasoconstriction in cynomolgus monkeys and humans, and 17 beta-estradiol improves exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in female patients. We investigated the effect of the naturally occurring estrogen 17 beta-estradiol on the coronary circulation in postmenopausal women and men with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied nine postmenopausal women 59 +/- 3 years old, mean +/- SEM, and seven men 52 +/- 4 years old with proven coronary artery disease. They underwent measurement of coronary artery diameter and coronary blood flow after intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine 1.6 and 16 micrograms/min before and 20 minutes after intracoronary administration of 2.5 micrograms of 17 beta-estradiol into atherosclerotic, nonstenotic coronary arteries. Changes in coronary artery diameter were measured by quantitative angiography, and changes in coronary blood flow were measured with an intracoronary Doppler catheter. In female patients, acetylcholine 1.6 and 16 micrograms/min caused constriction before the administration of 17 beta-estradiol (-6 +/- 2% and -8 +/- 5%, respectively, compared with baseline). This constrictor response was converted to dilatation after intracoronary administration of 17 beta-estradiol (+8 +/- 2% and +9 +/- 3%, respectively; P .05). Isosorbide dinitrate (1 mg) caused dilatation of the coronary arteries by 11 +/- 2% (P < .005). In men, acetylcholine 1.6 and 16 micrograms/min caused constriction both before and after the administration of 17 beta-estradiol and caused similar increases in coronary blood flow both before and after the intracoronary administration of 17 beta-estradiol. Infusion of intracoronary placebo in six female control patients 55 +/- 3 years old and six male control patients 56 +/- 3 years old did not change coronary diameter responses or coronary blood flow responses to acetylcholine. CONCLUSIONS: 17 beta-Estradiol modulates acetylcholine-induced coronary artery responses of female but not male atherosclerotic coronary arteries in vivo. These human data confirm reports from studies in cynomolgus monkeys that estrogen modulates the responses of atherosclerotic coronary arteries. An enhancement of endothelium-dependent relaxation by natural estrogen (as used in most hormone replacement therapy) may be important in postmenopausal women with established coronary heart disease and may contribute to the acute effect of 17 beta-estradiol on blood flow and its long-term protective effect on the development of coronary artery disease.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Collins
Université Paris-Sud
Giuseppe Rosano
Heart Failure & Transplant
Philip M. Sarrel
Yale University
Circulation
Yale University
Royal Brompton Hospital
Lung Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Collins et al. (Sat,) conducted a other in Coronary artery disease (n=28). 17 beta-estradiol vs. Placebo was evaluated on Changes in coronary artery diameter and coronary blood flow after intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine (p=<.01). Intracoronary 17 beta-estradiol converted acetylcholine-induced coronary constriction to dilatation in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease (P<0.01), but had no effect in men.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ed19c38eb9bccee7e7db8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.1.24