This thesis uses an audit study field experiment to examine potential hiring discrimination against male job candidates entering traditionally female-dominated fields. The experiment revealed evidence of discrimination against male candidates in some female-dominated fields, but for male candidates in others. Notably, the descriptive findings suggest that occupations emphasizing manual labor may exhibit a preference for male candidates. However, it is important to note that these descriptive findings are purely observational in nature and require further analysis to establish causal relationships. Furthermore, the study contributes to the literature by shedding light on the nuanced heterogeneity within specific occupations regarding responses to male candidates. While the research does not delve into the underlying causes or mechanisms driving such discrimination, it emphasizes the presence of bias in hiring practices. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the complex dynamics influencing gender-based employment disparities in traditionally female-dominated sectors.
Cole Weaver (Tue,) studied this question.