Objective: The current non-invasive screening methods for endometrial cancer (EC), such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), lack sufficient specificity, leading to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures. The detection of cancer-specific deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation alterations in cervical cytology samples presents a promising, minimally invasive alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of novel DNA methylation biomarkers (CUGBP Elav-like family member 4 methylation CELF4 m , Galanin receptor 1 methylation GALR1 m , Zinc finger protein 486 methylation ZNF486 m ) in cervical exfoliated cells for EC screening. Material and Methods: This case–control study enrolled patients scheduled for diagnostic or surgical curettage at the hospital from September 2024 to June 2025. A total of 104 women underwent endometrial evaluation (32 type I EC, 3 type II EC, 61 benign lesions BL, 8 atypical hyperplasia). Quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction assessed biomarker performance against histopathological diagnosis. Results: All three markers ( CELF4 m , GALR1 m , ZNF486 m ) showed significant differential ΔCp values between BL and EC groups (all P < 0.01), with moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve AUCs: 0.654-0.704). The single-marker GALR1 m outperformed endometrial thickness (ET) measured by TVUS in specificity (60.9% vs. 27.5%, P < 0.001) while maintaining comparable sensitivity (80.0% vs. 74.3%, P = 0.527). A two-marker panel ( GALR1 m / ZNF486 m , Model 1) achieved sensitivity (97.1% 95% confidence interval [CI: 91.6–100%]) with modest specificity (49.3% 95% CI: 37.5-61.1%). Among three-gene models, Model 3 demonstrated the highest overall performance (AUC: 0.733 95% CI: 0.657-0.808; sensitivity: 91.4% 95% CI: 82.1-100%), whereas Model 4 balanced sensitivity (80.0% 95% CI: 66.7-93.3%) and improved specificity (63.8% 95% CI: 52.4-75.1%). Conclusion: DNA methylation signatures in cervical cells show superior diagnostic accuracy to conventional ET measured by TVUS, particularly through multi-marker panels. This non-invasive approach represents a promising EC screening strategy.
Fan et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: