PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2004Circulation72 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic Value of Pharmacological Stress Echocardiography Is Affected by Concomitant Antiischemic Therapy at the Time of Testing

View Full Paper
RSRosa SicariLCLauro CortigianiRBRiccardo Bigi

Key Result

Concomitant antiischemic therapy during pharmacological stress echocardiography modulates its prognostic value, with survival ranging from 95% (negative test off therapy) to 81% (positive test on therapy; P=0.0000).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=7,333)

Structured PICO

Does concomitant antiischemic therapy affect the prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients undergoing diagnostic testing?

P
Population
7,333 patients (mean age 59 years, 25.6% female) undergoing pharmacological stress echocardiography for diagnostic purposes, followed for a mean of 2.6 years.
E
Exposure
Pharmacological stress echocardiography (high-dose dipyridamole 0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes or high-dose dobutamine up to 40 microg/kg/min) performed while on antiischemic therapy (nitrates and/or calcium antagonists and/or beta-blockers)
C
Comparator
Pharmacological stress echocardiography performed off antiischemic therapy
O
Outcome
Survival (total mortality and cardiac death) over a mean follow-up of 2.6 yearshard clinical

Concomitant antiischemic therapy during pharmacological stress echocardiography significantly alters its prognostic value, making a positive test more malignant and a negative test less benign.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 81% vs 95%

p-value: p=0.0000

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether antianginal medications affect the prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the EPIC-EDIC Data Bank, 7333 patients (5452 men; age; 59+/-10 years) underwent pharmacological stress echocardiography with either high-dose dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg over 10 minutes; n=4984) or high-dose dobutamine (up to 40 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1); n=2349) (DET) for diagnostic purposes. At the time of testing, 1791 patients were on antiischemic therapy (nitrates and/or calcium antagonists and/or beta-blockers). Patients were followed up for a mean of 2.6 years (range, 1 to 206 months). DET was positive for myocardial ischemia in 2854 patients (39%) and negative in 4479 (61%). Total mortality was 336 (4.5%). Death was attributed to cardiac causes in 161 patients (2.1%). Survival was highest in patients with negative DET off therapy and lowest in patients with positive DET studied on therapy (95% versus 81%; P=0.0000). Survival was comparable in patients with a negative test on therapy and in patients with a positive test off therapy (88% versus 84%, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing antiischemic therapy at the time of testing heavily modulates the prognostic value of pharmacological stress echo. In the presence of concomitant antiischemic therapy, a positive test is more prognostically malignant, and a negative test less prognostically benign.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sicari et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing pharmacological stress echocardiography (n=7,333). Concomitant antiischemic therapy vs. No antiischemic therapy was evaluated on Survival (p=0.0000). Concomitant antiischemic therapy during pharmacological stress echocardiography modulates its prognostic value, with survival ranging from 95% (negative test off therapy) to 81% (positive test on therapy; P=0.0000).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2031738753b605d8b5c7c1https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000127427.03361.5e
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper