A hierarchical multilevel model estimated that 10.1% of the total variability in 30-day mortality after isolated CABG surgery was explained by differences between clinical centers.
Observational (n=34,310)
Yes
Hierarchical modeling reveals that the specific clinical centre accounts for a substantial portion (10.1%) of the variability in 30-day mortality after CABG, highlighting the importance of hospital-level factors in surgical outcomes.
Effect estimate: ICC 10.1%
BACKGROUND: Hierarchical modelling represents a statistical method used to analyze nested data, as those concerning patients afferent to different hospitals. Aim of this paper is to build a hierarchical regression model using data from the "Italian CABG outcome study" in order to evaluate the amount of differences in adjusted mortality rates attributable to differences between centres. METHODS: The study population consists of all adult patients undergoing an isolated CABG between 2002-2004 in the 64 participating cardiac surgery centres.A risk adjustment model was developed using a classical single-level regression. In the multilevel approach, the variable "clinical-centre" was employed as a group-level identifier. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to estimate the proportion of variability in mortality between groups. Group-level residuals were adopted to evaluate the effect of clinical centre on mortality and to compare hospitals performance. Spearman correlation coefficient of ranks (rho) was used to compare results from classical and hierarchical model. RESULTS: The study population was made of 34,310 subjects (mortality rate = 2.61%; range 0.33-7.63). The multilevel model estimated that 10.1% of total variability in mortality was explained by differences between centres. The analysis of group-level residuals highlighted 3 centres (VS 8 in the classical methodology) with estimated mortality rates lower than the mean and 11 centres (VS 7) with rates significantly higher. Results from the two methodologies were comparable (rho = 0.99). CONCLUSION: Despite known individual risk-factors were accounted for in the single-level model, the high variability explained by the variable "clinical-centre" states its importance in predicting 30-day mortality after CABG.
D’Errigo et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (n=34,310). Clinical center clustering (Hierarchical modeling) vs. Classical single-level regression was evaluated on Proportion of variability in 30-day mortality explained by differences between centres (Intraclass correlation coefficient) (ICC 10.1%). A hierarchical multilevel model estimated that 10.1% of the total variability in 30-day mortality after isolated CABG surgery was explained by differences between clinical centers.