Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Practical approaches and standardisation of forensic human rights anthropology have been central areas of debate since the origin of the field in 1980s Argentina. However, post-conflict investigations challenge this current focus on standardisation due to the diversity of sociocultural contexts and a demand for culturally informed methodologies. Through a collaborative research project in northern Uganda, a team of anthropologists have addressed some of these issues in a context where spiritual disturbances associated with human remains from the recent war generate ongoing negative effects for Acholi survivors. Here, one facet of this longitudinal project is presented – forensic site surveys, their impact on collaboration with survivors, and their application to sociocultural, rather than traditional forensic, needs and international rights. The methodology presented here introduces a way to incorporate emic prerogatives by treating intangible effects of human remains as imperative to the medico-legal context and the site map. In conclusion, this methodology may offer a way to overcome western-centric human rights approaches while allowing local communities to further define what features are integral to the ‘forensic’ documentation process; tangible or intangible.
Elgerud et al. (Mon,) studied this question.