Routine preoperative group and save testing is unnecessary for cholecystectomy and appendectomy, given the extremely low perioperative blood transfusion rates of 2.1% and 0.1%, respectively.
Systematic Review (n=477,437)
477,437 patients undergoing elective or emergency cholecystectomy or appendectomy across 15 retrospective studies to evaluate the necessity of preoperative group and save testing.
Preoperative group and save (G&S) testing vs No routine testing
Perioperative blood transfusion rate
PURPOSE: Blood typing, or group and save (G&S) testing, is commonly performed prior to cholecystectomy and appendectomy in many hospitals. In order to determine whether G&S testing is required prior to these procedures, we set out to evaluate the relevant literature and associated rates of perioperative blood transfusion. METHODS: Studies from January 1990 to June 2021 assessing the requirement of preoperative G&S testing for elective or emergency cholecystectomy and appendectomy were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search was performed on 6th July 2021 (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021267967). Number of patients, co-morbidities, operation performed, number of patients that underwent preoperative G&S testing, perioperative transfusion rates and financial costs were extracted. RESULTS: We initially screened 194 studies of which 15 retrospective studies, a total of 477,437 patients, specifically met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies reported on cholecystectomy, two studies on appendectomy and three studies included both procedures. Where reported, a total of 177,539/469,342 (37.8%) patients underwent preoperative G&S testing with a perioperative transfusion rate of 2.1% (range 0.0 to 2.1%). The main preoperative risk factors associated with perioperative blood transfusion identified include cardiovascular co-morbidity, coagulopathy, anaemia and haematological malignancy. All 15 studies concluded that routine G&S is not warranted. CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggests that G&S is not necessarily required for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy or appendectomy. Having a targeted G&S approach would reduce delays in elective and emergency lists, reduce the burden on the blood transfusion service and have financial implications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael G Fadel
London Chest Hospital
Ishaan Patel
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
Lawrence O’Leary
University of Liverpool
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fadel et al. (Sat,) conducted a systematic review in Patients undergoing cholecystectomy or appendectomy (n=477,437). Preoperative group and save (G&S) testing vs. No routine testing was evaluated on Perioperative blood transfusion rate. Routine preoperative group and save testing is unnecessary for cholecystectomy and appendectomy, given the extremely low perioperative blood transfusion rates of 2.1% and 0.1%, respectively.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2386a2bcda00f3e0a005d3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02600-x