MicroRNAs (miRNAs) show potential as early biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Can miRNAs serve as early biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular complications in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
MicroRNAs show promise as early diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, potentially enabling better therapeutic approaches.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications pose a serious threat to the life and health of patients around the world. The most dangerous complications of this disease are vascular complications. Microvascular complications of T2DM include retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. In turn, macrovascular complications include coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and cerebrovascular disease. The currently used diagnostic methods do not ensure detection of the disease at an early stage, and they also do not predict the risk of developing specific complications. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, endogenous, noncoding molecules that are involved in key processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Recent research has assigned them an important role as potential biomarkers for detecting complications related to diabetes. We suggest that utilizing miRNAs can be a routine approach for early diagnosis and prognosis of diseases and may enable the development of better therapeutic approaches. In this paper, we conduct a review of the latest reports demonstrating the usefulness of miRNAs as biomarkers in the vascular complications of T2DM.
Bielska et al. (Fri,) conducted a review in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and vascular complications. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) was evaluated. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) show potential as early biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: