This paper is archived as a speculative research work. This paper develops the scalar-field origin of the finite electric-charge class in Entanglement Algebraic Spacetime (EAS) while separating charge, current, and electromagnetic-field-facing structure. Charge is not introduced as a primitive scalar value, scalar sign, current, gauge field, photon, force, or spacetime field. The paper identifies the finite charge class as the completed common-mode representation weight of a bounded handed support. Support formation is treated as a handedness-sorting process: same-handed-enough points form coherent bounded support structure, while non-support-eligible handedness structure remains exterior/dressing-facing. A coherent handed support determines a charge-class report rhoH, whose additive, cyclically invariant, completed-support-normalized compression gives Q = CQ (rhoH) in -1, 0, +1. This charge class is not a current and is not the electromagnetic field. The conserved-current-facing object is instead the charge-weighted Noether-facing recurrent-wave report JQ_ = Q J^wave_, where J^wave_ arises only in a stable recurrent pattern-wave sector with continuous report-wave phase. The electromagnetic-field-facing object is local report-frame comparison and closed-cycle holonomy in such stable recurrent-wave sectors, not handedness itself. This separation explains how electron-, muon-, and tau-like supports can share the same unit charge class while differing in mass-facing support-interior recurrence, stiffness, or scalar-amplitude structure. The resulting bridge to the EAS/NCG QED construction is rhoH -> Q, Q J^wave -> J^, local report-frame holonomy -> F. The result gives a scalar-field account of charge class, charge sign, charge conservation, current-facing Noether report structure, and electromagnetic-field-facing holonomy structure; it does not derive the empirical coupling e, the fine-structure constant, continuum spacetime, scattering amplitudes, or the full quantized QED path integral.
Michael Labhard (2026) studied this question.