What question did this study set out to answer?

This research investigates how different airflow configurations in curing barns affect the quality of tobacco leaves and energy consumption.

June 7, 2026

Effects of structural configurations in bidirectional airflow bulk curing barns on curing uniformity, energy consumption, and quality of tobacco leaves

Key Points

This research investigates how different airflow configurations in curing barns affect the quality of tobacco leaves and energy consumption.
Evaluated three barn types: downward-airflow biomass barn (CK), conventional bidirectional barn (T1), vertical-square barn (T2).
Assessed temperature-humidity distribution, physical properties, and energy consumption of tobacco during drying.
Analyzed the impact of configurations on cured leaf quality and energy use.
T1 and T2 showed greater temperature-humidity homogeneity than CK (p < 0.05).
T2 exhibited a higher overall dehydration rate, outperforming T1 and CK in leaf quality, sensory evaluation, and economic traits.
T1 reduced energy consumption by 6.98%–19.31% compared to CK, though still less efficient than T2.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the impact of airflow direction and spatial configuration in an intensive drying barn on temperature-humidity uniformity, tobacco leaf physical properties, quality, and energy consumption, using K326 mid-leaf tobacco as the test material. Three barn types were evaluated: the downward-airflow biomass bulk curing barn (CK), the conventional bidirectional-airflow barn (T1), and the vertical-square bidirectional-airflow barn (T2). Temperature-humidity distribution, tobacco leaf physical properties, cured leaf quality, and energy consumption during drying were assessed. Results showed that during color-fixing and stem-drying stages, T1 and T2 achieved greater temperature-humidity homogeneity than CK, with T2 reducing horizontal and vertical differentials more effectively. T1 reduced the temperature-humidity coefficient of variation by 42.86%–67.86% compared to CK (p T1 > CK. Bidirectional airflow circulation barns (T1 and T2) enhanced the accumulation of neutral aroma compounds and polyphenols, with T2 showing the most pronounced benefits. Additionally, T1 significantly increased the content of four major degradation products (e.g., plastid pigments) by 13.52%–56.27% compared to CK (p T1 > CK. T1 increased the percentage of premium-grade leaves and the average price by over 10% compared to CK, although these values remained lower than those of T2. Bidirectional airflow barns reduced curing energy consumption, with T1 lowering biomass fuel use, electricity consumption, and curing time by 6.98%–19.31% relative to CK, though it was less efficient than T2. Bidirectional-airflow barns, especially vertical-square configurations, enhanced temperature-humidity uniformity. This facilitated water evaporation and leaf deformation during curing, increased neutral aroma compounds and polyphenols, improved sensory quality, reduced energy consumption, and elevated economic traits.

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

Cite This Study

Shao et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250c027def13d035e1c0a0 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2026.2679993

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

AI에게 질문

Bookmark