PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 7, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology692 citationsOpen Access

10-Year Coronary Heart Disease Risk Prediction Using Coronary Artery Calcium and Traditional Risk Factors

RMRobyn L. McClellandNJNeal W. JorgensenMBMatthew J. Budoff

Key Result

Adding coronary artery calcium to traditional risk factors significantly improved 10-year coronary heart disease risk prediction (C-statistic 0.80 vs 0.75, p<0.0001).

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of coronary artery calcium in predicting 10-year coronary heart disease risk alongside traditional risk factors.
  • Analyzed coronary artery calcium scores in conjunction with established risk factors
  • Follow-up duration of 10 years to evaluate outcomes
  • Utilized a diverse population sample for robust results.
  • Higher coronary artery calcium scores significantly correlate with increased coronary heart disease risk (HR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.8-3.2, p<0.001).
  • Integration of traditional risk factors with calcium scores enhances prediction accuracy.
  • Indicates that measuring coronary artery calcium provides essential information for assessing long-term heart disease risk.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=6,814)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the inclusion of coronary artery calcium (CAC) to traditional risk factors improve 10-year coronary heart disease risk prediction in individuals free of baseline clinical heart disease?

P
Population
6,814 community-dwelling adults aged 45-84, free of clinical heart disease at baseline, followed for 10 years.
E
Exposure
Risk prediction model incorporating coronary artery calcium (CAC) and traditional risk factors (MESA risk score)
C
Comparator
Risk prediction model using traditional risk factors alone
O
Outcome
10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction accuracy (measured by C-statistic and calibration)

The addition of coronary artery calcium to traditional risk factors significantly improves the discrimination and calibration of 10-year coronary heart disease risk prediction.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.8% vs 0.75%

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

Background Several studies have demonstrated the tremendous potential of using coronary artery calcium (CAC) in addition to traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction. However, to date no risk score incorporating CAC has been developed. Objectives Our goal was to derive and validate a novel risk score to estimate 10-year CHD risk using CAC and traditional risk factors. Methods Algorithm development was conducted in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), a prospective community-based cohort study of 6814 participants aged 45–84, free of clinical heart disease at baseline and followed for 10 years. MESA is gender balanced and included 39% Non-Hispanic whites, 12% Chinese American, 28% African American, and 22% Hispanic Americans. External validation was conducted in the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (HNR) and the Dallas Heart Study (DHS). Results Inclusion of CAC in the MESA risk score offered significant improvements in risk prediction (C-statistic 0.80 versus 0.75, p<0.0001). External validation in both HNR and DHS provided evidence of very good discrimination and calibration. Harrell’s C-statistic was 0.779 in HNR, and 0.816 in DHS. Additionally the difference in estimated 10-year risk between events and non-events was approximately 8–9%, indicating excellent discrimination. Mean calibration, or calibration-in-the-large, was excellent for both studies, with average predicted 10-year risk within half a percent of the observed event rate. Conclusions An accurate estimate of 10-year CHD risk can be obtained using traditional risk factors and CAC. The MESA risk score, which is available online on the MESA web site for easy use, can be used to aid clinicians in the communication of risk to patients and when determining risk-based treatment strategies.

Expert Takes7 quotes

1/7

“I don't use the PCE very much. I use the MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis]. I like it because it gives me options I don't have with the PCE [pooled cohort equations].”

Robert A. Vogel, Preventive cardiologist, University of Colorado DenverUniversity of Colorado at Denverauto_pipelineSupportiveView source
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McClelland et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=6,814). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) addition to traditional risk factors vs. Traditional risk factors alone was evaluated on 10-year CHD risk prediction (C-statistic) (p=<0.0001). Adding coronary artery calcium to traditional risk factors significantly improved 10-year coronary heart disease risk prediction (C-statistic 0.80 vs 0.75, p<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2537823f3236f5edd4383ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.035
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper