The following errors were found in this manuscript and were corrected as follows: 1. Figure 2d was found to have a duplicated image (panels for pLKO and sh#1 were inadvertently duplicated for the MOLM-13 and U937 cell lines). This has been corrected by replacing the MOLM-13 image with the correct data in the updated Figure 2d file. 2. Tabs for Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 in the “Raw Data” Excel file were mislabeled (mistakenly prefixed with 1 (e.g., 1a, 1b, 1c) where they should have been prefixed with “2” (e.g., 2a, 2b, 2c) for Fig. 2 and “3” for Fig. 3. This labeling error has been corrected in the raw data file tabs corresponding to Figures 2 and 3. 3. The excel file for RAW data (tab Fig.2, Fig. 2d), had mistakenly listed the first entry for shRNF5#1 (MOLM-13) as 17.67. This value represents the average of three technical replicates that were rounded now to the integer 18 for clarity and consistency. 4. Molecular weight for RNF5 was mislabeled in Figure 5h and Supplementary Fig. 2h. The correct molecular weight (~15 kDa) has been corrected now in both figures. Molecular weight for RBBP4 was also mislabeled in Figure 5h and has been corrected (~55 kDa). 5. Raw data error for Supplementary Fig. 7c (unintentional duplication for sh#1 resulted in same numbers for row 6 columns 1-3 and row 7 columns 1-3 for the shRNF5#1). This has been now corrected, and the correct values were updated in the revised RAW data file. Correspondingly, Supplementary Fig. 7c has been updated accordingly.
Khateb et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: