Abstract This paper examines the effects of using an arm's-length transfer price, such as the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method, to allocate income for tax purposes between a manufacturing entity and a selling entity within a multinational enterprise (MNE). The CUP method allocates disproportionately high levels of income earned. by the MNE to the manufacturer In our model. This result Is consistent with . the anomaly identified in Grubert et al. (1993) and Collins et al. (1997), in which U.S. subsidiaries of foreign MNEs frequently report zero, or near-zero, taxable income. In addition, the CUP method distorts decisions regarding production and organizational structure when the tax rates In the two countries differ.
Harris et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: