Chronotype significantly influenced diurnal differences in flow-mediated dilatation (p=0.010), driven by a strong relationship in the evening where later types showed attenuated responses (p<0.001).
Observational (n=17)
No
Does chronotype influence the diurnal variation of endothelial vasodilation in healthy humans?
Chronotype influences the diurnal variation of endothelial vasodilation, with the effect being much stronger in the evening, highlighting potential mechanisms for the diurnal rhythm of cardiovascular events.
Effect estimate: R2 = 0.37
p-value: p=0.010
INTRODUCTION: The time of day when cardiovascular events are most likely to occur is thought to be aligned with the circadian rhythm of physiological variables. Chronotype has been shown to influence the time of day when cardiovascular events happen, with early chronotypes reported to be more susceptible in the morning and late chronotypes in the evening. However, no studies have investigated the influence of chronotype on physiological variables responsible for cardiovascular regulation in healthy individuals. METHODS: 312 individuals completed the Munich ChronoTyping Questionnaire to assess chronotype. Twenty participants were randomly selected to continue into the main study. In a repeated-measures experiment, participants were tested between 08:00-10:00 h and again between 18:00-20:00 h. Measurements of mean arterial pressure, heart rate and vascular endothelial vasodilation via flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) were obtained at each session. RESULTS: Individual diurnal differences in mean arterial pressure and heart rate show no significant relationship with chronotype. Diurnal differences in FMD showed a significant correlation (p = 0.010), driven by a clear significant relationship in the evening and not the morning (p > 0.001). CONCLUSION: These preliminary data indicate that chronotype influences the diurnal variation of endothelial vasodilation measured using flow-mediated dilatation. Furthermore, we show that the influence of chronotype is much stronger in the evening, highlighting an increased susceptibility for later types. These findings are consistent with the diurnal rhythm in cardiovascular events and uncover potential mechanisms of local mediators that may underpin the influence of chronotype in the onset of these events.
Facer‐Childs et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Healthy (n=17). Chronotype vs. Different chronotypes (early vs late) was evaluated on Diurnal differences in flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) (R2 = 0.37, p=0.010). Chronotype significantly influenced diurnal differences in flow-mediated dilatation (p=0.010), driven by a strong relationship in the evening where later types showed attenuated responses (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: