Intimate Partner Violence, Public Opinion, and Legal Changes in Bulgaria: Dynamic Relationship and Unexpected Consequences

Violence against women and intimate partner violence in particular are recognized as significant social issues. This article explores the dynamic interplay between intimate partner violence, public opinion, and legislative changes in Bulgaria. The data we used were collected through in-depth interviews and focus groups with professionals working on issues of domestic violence and violence against women in Bulgaria. Using a specific case of violence as an example, the study argues that public pressure is a catalyst for changes in the legal framework for protection against domestic violence. However, the findings suggest a propensity for certain measures to be influenced by penal populism, often taking on the characteristics of symbolic policymaking—declaring political commitment, but showing vulnerabilities in their practical application. In this context, the perspective of policy implementation and unintended consequences reveals how gaps in institutional capacity, coordination, and enforcement produced outcomes that differed from those declared publicly. The article concludes that an integrated approach going beyond penal populism and symbolic policy demonstrations is necessary. To effectively combat domestic and intimate partner violence in Bulgaria, there is a need for a long-term strategy that considers the intricate relationships between public attitudes, policymaking, and the actual implementation of legislation.