Abstract This paper investigates dust-acoustic waves in a polarized, self-gravitating dusty plasma with kappa-distributed superthermal ions. We resolve the longstanding degeneracy in the common Ψ = ΓΦ assumption by demonstrating that polarization and self-gravity, though mathematically coupled, exert physically distinct influences on wave dynamics. Linear analysis reveals that polarization actively suppresses wave propagation, while self-gravity controls Jeans instability thresholds; their competition creates tunable stability boundaries scalable with plasma parameters. Through reductive perturbation theory, we derive a gravitationally modified Korteweg–de Vries equation whose coefficients explicitly depend on polarization strength R, self-gravity parameter (Γ), and ion superthermality κ i. Analytical solutions obtained via the (g ′/ g) expansion method yield a spectrum of coherent structures, including bright solitons, kinks, and singular waves. The joint modification of wave propagation arises from a scale-dependent competition: self-gravity acts as a long-range attractive force that reduces phase velocity and fosters clumping, while the polarization force provides a repulsive correction sensitive to plasma gradients. The physical mechanism is driven by ion superthermality; a lower spectral index κ i provides a more energetic ion population that more easily deforms the Debye shielding cloud around dust grains, thereby strengthening the polarization force and intensifying nonlinear steepening. Strong ion superthermality (lower κ i) amplifies both mechanisms by increasing the polarization coefficients c κ 1 c ₁, c κ 2 c ₂ and reducing the effective Jeans length, thereby promoting the formation of persistent, macroscopic structures. These results provide a unified mechanism to explain transient “spokes” in Saturn’s rings and initial dust clumping in protoplanetary disks, bridging grain-scale interactions to collective astrophysical phenomena.
Iqbal et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: