This study presents the design and implementation of a single-institution intelligent diagnostic system to identify low mid-period academic performance, aimed at activating proactive and preventive tutoring before a final assessment. The system features an integrated analytical architecture comprising an inferential framework, a predictive framework, an explainability framework, a validation framework, and a Streamlit-based web prototype. The sample uses 18,604 longitudinal academic records from 1264 unique students enrolled across 7 consecutive academic periods (2017–2020) at an Ecuadorian university. Results indicate that curricular level is the structural predictor with the greatest independent contribution (semi-partial R2 = 0.044), followed by academic period (semi-partial R2 = 0.026). Random Forest achieved the best overall performance (MAE = 1.267 ± 0.04; RMSE = 1.714 ± 0.05; R2 = 0.551 ± 0.02), outperforming other algorithms. SHAP explainability confirms the primacy of curricular level and academic period as individual-level risk-associated factors, enabling the generation of interpretable alerts for tutors. The equity analysis revealed that students aged 30–50 years (ratio = 1.375) and the province with code 18 (ratio = 1.395) constitute priority subgroups for data enrichment prior to institutional deployment. External validation with real users is identified as the next research stage.
Guaman et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: