The CardioTag wearable sensor and machine learning algorithm estimated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure with a mean error of 1.04 ± 5.57 mm Hg compared to right heart catheterization.
Observational (n=310)
Blinded core laboratory
Yes
Does a noninvasive wearable sensor and machine learning algorithm accurately estimate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure compared to invasive right heart catheterization in patients with HFrEF?
A noninvasive wearable sensor combined with a machine learning algorithm can estimate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in HFrEF patients with an accuracy approaching that of invasive right heart catheterization.
Mean Difference: 1.04
BACKGROUND: Remote hemodynamics-guided management of heart failure (HF) with implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors has been shown to reduce HF hospitalizations. The widespread clinical adoption of this procedure is constrained by its invasive nature and high cost. We present a noninvasive technology based on a wearable sensor (CardioTag; Cardiosense) and machine learning (ML) for estimating pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). OBJECTIVES: The authors developed and evaluated (against right heart catheterization RHC) an ML model to estimate PCWP with the use of electrocardiography, seismocardiography, and photoplethysmography signals from CardioTag. METHODS: A multicenter prospective study was performed, and 310 patients with HFrEF (EF ≤40%) were recruited in both inpatient and outpatient settings. A blinded core laboratory adjudicated the RHC PCWP tracings to yield criterion-standard PCWP labels against which the model was trained and tested. The data were separated into 2 sets: a training set for model training and fine-tuning, and a held-out testing set unseen until final evaluation. RESULTS: The patients were 61± 13 years of age, 38% female, 44% White, and 39% African American, and had a PCWP of 18.1 ± 9.45 mm Hg. The model estimated PCWP values in the held-out test set with error of 1.04 ± 5.57 mm Hg (limits of agreement of -9.9 to 11.9 mm Hg), with consistent performance across sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: The CardioTag and its ML algorithm estimate PCWP with accuracy approaching implantable hemodynamic sensors, potentially offering a more accessible and cost-effective option for hemodynamics-guided management in HFrEF patients.
Klein et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=310). CardioTag wearable sensor and machine learning model vs. Right heart catheterization (RHC) was evaluated on Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) estimation error (Mean error 1.04 mm Hg, 95% CI Limits of agreement -9.9 to 11.9). The CardioTag wearable sensor and machine learning algorithm estimated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure with a mean error of 1.04 ± 5.57 mm Hg compared to right heart catheterization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: