PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2014Magnetic Resonance in Medicine90 citationsOpen Access

A methodology to detect abnormal relative wall shear stress on the full surface of the thoracic aorta using four-dimensional flow MRI

View Full Paper
POPim van OoijWPWouter V. PottersANAart J. Nederveen

Key Result

Four-dimensional flow MRI detected significantly lower wall shear stress on 7% of the ascending aorta surface in patients with aortic dilation and higher stress on 34% in those with aortic stenosis.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=30)

Structured PICO

Can four-dimensional flow MRI detect abnormal regional wall shear stress in patients with aortic dilatation or valvular stenosis compared to healthy controls?

P
Population
30 subjects comprising 10 healthy controls, 10 patients with dilated aortas, and 10 patients with aortic valve stenosis evaluated with four-dimensional flow MRI.
E
Exposure
Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI with computation of cohort-averaged wall shear stress (WSS) maps
C
Comparator
Healthy controls
O
Outcome
Regional relative wall shear stress (WSS) differences between groupssurrogate

Four-dimensional flow MRI can successfully generate cohort-averaged wall shear stress maps to identify regionally altered hemodynamics in patients with aortic disease.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compute cohort-averaged wall shear stress (WSS) maps in the thoracic aorta of patients with aortic dilatation or valvular stenosis and to detect abnormal regional WSS. METHODS: Systolic WSS vectors, estimated from four-dimensional flow MRI data, were calculated along the thoracic aorta lumen in 10 controls, 10 patients with dilated aortas, and 10 patients with aortic valve stenosis. Three-dimensional segmentations of each aorta were coregistered by group and used to create a cohort-specific aortic geometry. The WSS vectors of each subject were interpolated onto the corresponding cohort-specific geometry to create cohort-averaged WSS maps. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to generate aortic P-value maps (P<0.05) representing regional relative WSS differences between groups. RESULTS: Cohort-averaged systolic WSS maps and P-value maps were successfully created for all cohorts and comparisons. The dilation cohort showed significantly lower WSS on 7% of the ascending aorta surface, whereas the stenosis cohort showed significantly higher WSS on 34% of the ascending aorta surface. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrated the feasibility of generating cohort-averaged WSS maps for the visualization and identification of regionally altered WSS in the presence of disease, compared with healthy controls.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ooij et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Aortic dilatation or aortic valve stenosis (n=30). Aortic dilatation and aortic valve stenosis vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Regional relative wall shear stress (WSS) differences (p=<0.05). Four-dimensional flow MRI detected significantly lower wall shear stress on 7% of the ascending aorta surface in patients with aortic dilation and higher stress on 34% in those with aortic stenosis.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a430f155a8279e76234fb9ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper