Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: ) DWI regarding diagnostic performance in the detection of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched up to April 1, 2017. The analysis included diagnostic accuracy studies in which high- and standard-b-value DWI were used for prostate cancer detection with histopathologic examination as the reference standard. Methodologic quality was assessed with the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Sensitivity and specificity of all studies were calculated and were pooled and plotted in a hierarchic summary ROC plot. Meta-regression and multiple-subgroup analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic performances of high- and standard-b-value DWI. RESULTS: Eleven studies (789 patients) were included. High-b-value DWI had greater pooled sensitivity (0.80 95% CI, 0.70-0.87) (p = 0.03) and specificity (0.92 95% CI, 0.87-0.95) (p = 0.01) than standard-b-value DWI (sensitivity, 0.78 95% CI, 0.66-0.86); specificity, 0.87 95% CI, 0.77-0.93 (p < 0.01). Multiple-subgroup analyses showed that specificity was consistently higher for high- than for standard-b-value DWI (p ≤ 0.05). Sensitivity was significantly higher for high- than for standard-b-value DWI only in the following subgroups: peripheral zone only, transition zone only, multiparametric protocol (DWI and T2-weighted imaging), visual assessment of DW images, and per-lesion analysis (p ≤ 0.04). CONCLUSION: In a head-to-head comparison, high-b-value DWI had significantly better sensitivity and specificity for detection of prostate cancer than did standard-b-value DWI. Multiple-subgroup analyses showed that specificity was consistently superior for high-b-value DWI.
Woo et al. (2017) studied this question.