PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1988AJP Renal Physiology97 citations

Enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback during peritubular infusions of angiotensins I and II

View Full Paper
KMKenneth D. MitchellLNL. Gabriel Navar

Key Result

Peritubular capillary infusion of angiotensin I or II enhanced the magnitude of stop-flow pressure feedback responses in anesthetized rats, indicating ANG II enhances tubuloglomerular feedback.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized rats used to determine whether increases in intrarenal generation of angiotensin II can enhance the sensitivity of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism.
I
Intervention
Simultaneous peritubular capillary infusion of either angiotensin I (ANG I) or angiotensin II (ANG II)
C
Comparator
Control conditions and infusion of saralasin (ANG II receptor antagonist) alone or with ANG I
O
Outcome
Stop-flow pressure (SFP) feedback responses to step increases in late proximal perfusion ratesurrogate

Angiotensin II, whether added or formed de novo beyond the glomerular circulation, enhances the sensitivity of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism in a rat model.

Abstract

Experiments were performed in pentobarbital sodium-anesthetized rats to determine whether increases in intrarenal generation of angiotensin II (ANG II) can enhance the sensitivity of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism. Stop-flow pressure (SFP) feedback responses to step increases in late proximal perfusion rate were obtained during control conditions and during simultaneous peritubular capillary infusion of either angiotensin I (ANG I) or ANG II. Infusion of either 10(-7) M ANG II or 10(-5) M ANG I, at rates (18.3 +/- 0.9 and 14.8 +/- 1.5 nl/min, respectively) that did not affect resting SFP, enhanced the magnitude of SFP feedback responses both at a low proximal perfusion rate of 10 nl/min (2.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.2 and 4.5 +/- 1.0 vs. 0.1 +/- 0.1 mmHg, respectively) and at proximal perfusion rates (greater than 30 nl/min) that elicited a maximal feedback response (13.1 +/- 1.0 vs. 10.1 +/- 0.7 and 13.5 +/- 1.6 vs. 9.8 +/- 0.8 mmHg, respectively). With a higher ANG I infusion rate (20 nl/min), control SFP measured in the absence of distal volume delivery decreased from 39.2 +/- 0.6 to 12.0 +/- 2.8 mmHg (n = 18). These effects were blocked when the ANG II receptor antagonist, saralasin (10(-5) M, Sar), was added to the infusate. In addition, the magnitude of the maximal SFP feedback response was not altered during infusion of Sar alone or ANG I + Sar. These findings indicate that ANG II, either added or formed de novo beyond the glomerular circulation, can enhance the sensitivity of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mitchell et al. (1988) studied this question. Peritubular capillary infusion of angiotensin I (ANG I) or ANG II vs. Control conditions was evaluated on Stop-flow pressure (SFP) feedback responses to step increases in late proximal perfusion rate. Peritubular capillary infusion of angiotensin I or II enhanced the magnitude of stop-flow pressure feedback responses in anesthetized rats, indicating ANG II enhances tubuloglomerular feedback.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a65265721a6fa53c24c46c3https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.1988.255.3.f383
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper