In anesthetized rats, atrial natriuretic peptide increased resistance to venous return (42 vs 32 mmHg/ml/min/g; P<0.01) and decreased cardiac index (174 vs 215 ml/min/kg; P<0.05) compared to vehicle.
ANP decreases cardiac output by reducing venous return, which is driven partly by increased resistance to venous return rather than venodilation or blood flow redistribution.
Absolute Event Rate: 42% vs 32%
p-value: p=<0.01
To examine mechanisms by which administration of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) decreases venous return, we compared the hemodynamic effects of ANP (0.5 microgram X min-1 X kg-1), furosemide (FU, 10 micrograms X min-1 X kg-1), and hexamethonium (HEX, 0.5 mg X min-1 X kg-1) with those of vehicle (VE) in anesthetized rats. Compared with VE, ANP reduced mean arterial pressure (106 +/- 4 vs. 92 +/- 3 mmHg; P less than 0.05), central venous pressure (0.3 +/- 0.3 vs. -0.7 +/- 0.2 mmHg; P less than 0.01), and cardiac index (215 +/- 12 vs. 174 +/- 10 ml X min-1 X kg-1; P less than 0.05) and increased calculated resistance to venous return (32 +/- 3 vs. 42 +/- 2 mmHg X ml-1 X min X g; P less than 0.01). Mean circulatory filling pressure, distribution of blood flow between splanchnic organs and skeletal muscles, and total peripheral resistance remained unchanged. FU increased urine output similar to that of ANP, yet produced no hemodynamic changes, dissociating diuresis, and decreased cardiac output. HEX lowered arterial pressure through a reduction in total peripheral resistance without altering cardiac output or resistance to venous return. The results confirm previous findings that ANP decreases cardiac output through a reduction in venous return and suggest that this results partly from increased resistance to venous return and not from venodilation or redistribution of blood flow.
Chien et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Anesthetized rats. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) vs. Vehicle (VE) was evaluated on Resistance to venous return (p=<0.01). In anesthetized rats, atrial natriuretic peptide increased resistance to venous return (42 vs 32 mmHg/ml/min/g; P<0.01) and decreased cardiac index (174 vs 215 ml/min/kg; P<0.05) compared to vehicle.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: