Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Although pharmacy organizations have been instrumental in the movement to repeal antisubstitution laws, there is evidence that under the current fee-for-service system pharmacists have not exercised their newly obtained prerogatives freely. A previous study has demonstrated that paying pharmacists on a capitation basis for their Medicaid patients effects a highly significant increase in the rate of generic substitution. The present study was conducted to determine whether the pharmacists' newly acquired generic substitution habits "spill over" from Medicaid prescriptions as a result of capitation reimbursement. The results indicate that pharmacists who participated in the capitation experiment for the Medicaid drug program significantly increased their rate of generic substitution on non-Medicaid prescriptions. It was concluded that the same pharmacies that increased their substitution rate in the Medicaid program under capitation also increased their substitution rate on non-Medicaid prescriptions. Finally, generic substitutions in both the Medicaid and non-Medicaid studies generally involved the same labelers as well as drugs in the same therapeutic categories and with the same generic classifications.
Lipson et al. (1981) studied this question.