PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1993Diabetes124 citations

Endothelium-Dependent Vascular Relaxation in Patients With Type I Diabetes

View Full Paper
PSPaul SmitsJKJan-Auke KapmaMJM.C. Jacobs

Structured PICO

Does uncomplicated type I diabetes with chronic hyperglycemia impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation in vivo compared to healthy controls?

P
Population
22 subjects: 11 patients with type I diabetes (poor metabolic regulation with HbA1c > 8.5%, no microvascular complications) and 11 matched healthy control subjects.
I
Intervention
Assessment of forearm vasodilator responses using 5 min of forearm ischemia, intra-arterial infusion of methacholine (MCh) (0.03-0.3-1.0 micrograms.min-1.100 ml-1), and intra-arterial infusion of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (0.06-0.2-0.6 micrograms.min-1.100 ml-1).
C
Comparator
Matched healthy control subjects undergoing the same assessments.
O
Outcome
Forearm vasodilator responses (percentage fall in forearm vascular resistance [FVR]).surrogate

Chronic hyperglycemia in uncomplicated type I diabetes does not appear to impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation in vivo.

Abstract

The endothelium plays an important role in the regulation of vascular tone. Although animal data show evidence for an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in diabetes, human in vivo data are scarce. We investigated 11 type I diabetic patients and 11 matched healthy control subjects. The diabetic patients were selected on their relatively poor metabolic regulation (HbA1c > 8.5%), but none showed signs of microvascular complications. In all subjects, we recorded the forearm vasodilator responses to three different stimuli: 1) 5 min of forearm ischemia to obtain a maximal vasodilator response; 2) infusion of MCh into the brachial artery (dosages: 0.03-0.3-1.0 micrograms.min-1.100 ml-1 forearm volume) to evaluate endothelium-dependent vasodilation; and 3) intra-arterial infusion of SNP (dosages: 0.06-0.2-0.6 micrograms.min-1.100 ml-1) to evaluate endothelium-independent vasodilation. The diabetic patients had their usual subcutaneous insulin dose and breakfast 90 min before the start of the test. Baseline levels of BP and FBF were similar in both groups. The PORH response was similar in both groups, with a percentage fall in FVR of 92 +/- 1% in diabetic patients and 94 +/- 1% in control subjects. In the control subjects, MCh infusions exerted a dose-dependent vasodilator response with a maximal fall in the FVR of 90 +/- 2%. The highest dose of SNP induced a fall in FVR of 81 +/- 6% in this group. In diabetic patients, the percentage decrements in FVR during the several dosages of MCh and SNP were similar when compared with the control group. We conclude that chronic hyperglycemia, as occurred in our patients with uncomplicated diabetes mellitus, does not impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation in vivo.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smits et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70c7f187f921057127e2a1https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.42.1.148
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.1993 · 1,119 citations
  2. 2Impaired Contraction and Endothelium-Dependent Relaxation in Isolated Resistance Vessels from Patients with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus1994 · 141 citations
  3. 3Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, plasma markers of endothelial function, and adrenergic vasoconstrictor responses in type 1 diabetes under near-normoglycemic conditions.1999 · 78 citations
  4. 4Vasoconstriction to Endothelin-1 is Blunted in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes: A Dose-Response Study2000 · 23 citations
  5. 5Impaired Vasoconstriction to Endothelin 1 in Patients With NIDDM1996 · 85 citations