PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1929Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Containing Papers of a Biological Character16 citationsOpen Access

The delayed effects of pericardial removal

View Full Paper
HCH. M. Carleton

Key Result

Removal of the fibrous pericardium in cats followed for up to 17 months was used to observe delayed histological, radiological, and hemodynamic cardiac changes.

PICO

P
Population
Cats undergoing removal of the fibrous pericardium and followed for up to 17 months to observe cardiac changes.
I
Intervention / Comparator
Removal of the fibrous pericardium vs Normal heart
O
Primary Outcome
Cardiac changes (histological, radiological, and hemodynamic)

Abstract

Abstract The aim of these observations was to note such consequences, histological or other, as might ensue following removal of the fibrous pericardium. The development of cardiac changes being often slow, the pericardectomised cats were kept for considerable period (up to 17 months). In addition to recording the condition of the heart at necropsy, and on microscopic examination, radiograms of the normal and pericardectomised heart were made. Other lines of enquiry included direct inspection of the heart in situ under intra-tracheal ether, observation of the heart-rate, and some experiment on arterial and venous pressures. That the heart is very sensitive to pressure-changes within the pericardial sac is established. Lewis (11) conclusively showed in 1908 that so slight a rise in intra- pericardial pressure (in the cat) as 1 mm. lowers the systemic pressure by as much as 8 or 9 mm. of mercury. Conversely, a fall in intrapericardial pressure of 1 mm. induces a rise of some 8 to 9 mm. in the systemic pressure. The ill-effects of pericardial effusion—particularly when rapidly developed—are a clinical common-place ; once the intra-pericardial pressure comes to approximate that in the vena cava, the venous return to the heart is impeded and death may ensue (Williamson and Ets, 19, inter alia).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

H. M. Carleton (1929) studied Pericardial removal. Removal of the fibrous pericardium vs. Normal heart was evaluated on Cardiac changes (histological, radiological, and hemodynamic). Removal of the fibrous pericardium in cats followed for up to 17 months was used to observe delayed histological, radiological, and hemodynamic cardiac changes.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93f786c51251669500789ahttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1929.0039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1THE PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF THE CIRCULATORY SYSTEM TO EXPERIMENTAL ALTERATIONS1925 · 9 citations
  2. 2The effect of pericardium on the diastolic properties of the heart -Experimental studies on volume load and on acute ischemia in open chest dogs-.1982 · 8 citations
  3. 3THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PERICARDIUM IN RELATION TO SURGERY OF THE HEART1925 · 34 citations
  4. 4Left ventricular pressure-volume relations shift to the left after long-term loss of pericardial restraint.1983 · 15 citations
  5. 5Pericardial influences on right and left ventricular filling dynamics.1991 · 38 citations