Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Loading...
Mixed methods analysis shows that state interventions reduced violence in Tiaty, highlighting the need for equitable governance.
Cattle rustling in Kenya’s Tiaty sub-county persists as a complex crisis fueled by historical marginalisation, climate-induced resource scarcity, and governance failures. This mixed methods sequential explanatory design study integrates 12 years of incident data (2010–2023), satellite-derived ecological metrics, and phenomenological interviews (n=72) to evaluate state interventions and community perspectives. Findings reveal that infrastructure development (schools, dams) and National Police Reservists (NPRs) reduced raids by 37% and 28%, respectively, while militarised disarmament increased civilian casualties by 19% and deepened distrust. The study introduces the Resource-Governance-Conflict (RGC) framework, demonstrating how drought-driven pasture loss (NDVI < 0.2), corruption (r = 0.61 with raid frequency), and colonial-era grievances intersect to sustain cycles of violence. Community narratives highlight the transformative potential of participatory strategies:78% endorsed dialogue, while microloan programs reduced youth raid participation by 30%. Conversely, 82% condemned state coercion, citing human rights abuses and exclusion from decision-making. Policy recommendations prioritise multi-scalar solutions: (1) a tech-enabled early warning system co-designed with pastoralists; (2) a $5 million Tiaty Youth Empowerment Fund targeting unemployment (62%); (3) cross-border tribunals to dismantle transnational syndicates trafficking 15% of stolen livestock. The RGC framework advances scholarly debates by bridging political ecology and institutional theory, offering a replicable model for pastoral conflicts globally. By centering community agency and ecological justice, this study provides actionable pathways to transform Tiaty from a conflict hotspot into a resilience paradigm, urging policymakers to replace militarisation with equity-driven, climate-smart peacebuilding.
Ngetich et al. (2025) studied this question.