Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quasi-experimental study improves critical thinking and independence in fifth graders, suggesting digital media benefits learning.
This study examines the effectiveness of Articulate Storyline-based Smatt Math learning media in enhancing critical thinking and student independence among fifth-grade elementary students. A quasi-experimental research design was employed, involving an experimental group that utilized digital learning media and a control group that followed conventional learning methods. Pre-test and post-test assessments were conducted to measure critical thinking skills based on Ennis' (1985) framework, including analysis, evaluation, inference, and reasoning, while student independence was evaluated using Zimmerman’s (2002) self-regulated learning model, which encompasses self-motivation, self-monitoring, and self-reflection. The findings revealed a significant improvement in the experimental group compared to the control group. A paired t-test analysis demonstrated that students in the experimental group showed a 32.5% increase in critical thinking skills, whereas the control group exhibited only a 12.8% improvement. Similarly, student independence increased by 29.4% in the experimental group, compared to 10.6% in the control group. ANCOVA results confirmed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in post-test scores, reinforcing the effectiveness of the intervention. Classroom observations and interviews provided qualitative insights, indicating that students using digital media displayed greater engagement, active participation, and problem-solving perseverance. These results align with previous research on technology-enhanced learning environments, supporting constructivist theories that emphasize student-centered learning. The findings suggest that integrating interactive and multimedia-based learning tools in mathematics education can foster higher-order thinking skills and promote autonomous learning behaviors. Future research should explore the long-term effects and applicability of this intervention in diverse educational settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kusumandari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: