The increasing integration of digital technologies into border management has fundamentally reshaped the governance of migration, raising profound legal and ethical concerns. This article examines the impact of biometric control systems, artificial intelligence–driven risk analysis, and automated decision-making tools on migrant rights within the framework of international law and humanitarian principles. It highlights critical areas of human rights violations, including breaches of personal data security, discriminatory algorithmic profiling based on ethnicity or nationality, and the chilling effect of pervasive digital surveillance on freedom of expression. Legal conflicts arising from the application of the 1951 Refugee Convention, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and United Nations refugee protection instruments in the digital era are analyzed to demonstrate the normative gaps and enforcement challenges. Through case studies from the European Union, the United States–Mexico border, and Greece, the article illustrates the tangible human costs of automated pushback systems, biometric databases affecting children’s rights, and privacy concerns linked to large-scale data sharing. The discussion emphasizes the urgent need for a hybrid governance model that combines technological efficiency with robust human rights safeguards. Policy recommendations include the establishment of transparent and accountable AI governance mechanisms, mandatory human oversight in algorithmic decision-making, binding international standards for data protection in migration contexts, and increased corporate responsibility for technology providers involved in border control. Ultimately, the article argues that preserving human dignity in the age of digital borders requires a redefined balance between state security imperatives and the universal rights of migrants, anchored in both jus cogens norms and emerging digital ethics frameworks.
Kristina JÄRV (2025) studied this question.