The article critiques McGrath's view of Christian doctrine, suggesting a need for deeper hermeneutical understanding.
By characterizing Christian doctrine as theory, Alister McGrath both emphasizes similarities to the natural sciences and claims that theōria in the classical sense means seeing, not in a strictly intellectualist way. The present article argues that McGrath's understanding has positivist undertones and can be enriched by a stronger hermeneutical awareness of contextuality and positionality and by giving the interpretation of biblical texts and experience a larger role than McGrath does. The idea of mapping a complex territory, which McGrath borrows from Mary Midgley, offers viable perspectives, particularly when combined with a stronger emphasis on embodiment than McGrath offers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnold Huijgen (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: