Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study constructs a solution to the "p vs. np" problem using complexity theory.We show through counterexamples that p ≠ np and formalize the two sets using stochastic, probabilistic and non-deterministic modeling.While the well-known sets "pspace" and "npspace", analyzing the storage of a device, can be claimed to be equal, p and np differ and are exclusively defined through the elapsed time of their algorithms.Indeed, calculations including the probabilistic family of discrete uniform distributions prove the well-known inequality p ≠ np.In this study, using complexity and probability theory, we give some examples that fit into the new theory: There are problems that can be solved by non-deterministic Turing machines and which are in np (they are non-deterministic and just of polynomial time growth), but they are not in p itself (since they are not, deterministic and just of polynomial time growth).
Andres Boldori (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: