Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objectives The RCPCH gathers the voice of children and young people (CYP) across the UK. There is a wealth of valuable insight into what CYP would like to be improved in their healthcare, but this is not currently shared with RCPCH members in a way that could be used to create local improvement. Trainees also find it challenging to learn about and apply good quality, worthwhile QI projects that can be completed during a six month rotation with available options QI training being non-specific QI education or committing to large collaboratives. This QI project aimed to define and share the CYP-informed improvement ideas, to develop high quality improvement plan templates and to disseminate them to members to enact local change. Methods The problem was defined with driver diagram, stakeholder and fishbone mapping and a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach was taken. First cycle involved improvement thematic analysis of the CYP-voice in RCPCH implementing sustained change in mental health support provision in one trust. The trainee said '' I didn't know what I wanted to improve. I actually had... no idea of how to change it…Cross referencing the guide... for the methodology was useful…Voicebank helped for perspective on what direction to take'. Following PDSA cycle of how to better engage trainees we have currently 20 trainees and medical students actively applying the templates to complete QI projects in their local trusts. We have also established and positively evaluated a connections platform to enable sustained engagement in CYP-informed QI work for RCPCH members. Conclusion Together with the RCPCH &Us we have turned national CYP voice into local, targeted QI project inspiration which has been enacted in improvement projects by 21 trainees to date. We demonstrated the effectiveness of providing a QI template in our pilot study and successful translation of CYP-voice to action. We will gather more evidence of efficacy with the ongoing QI projects. We have established an effective platform for engaging with CYP trainee membership to participate in RCPCH projects.
Wyatt et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: