Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Monitoring the extent to which invasive alien species (IAS) negatively impact the environment is crucial for understanding and mitigating biological invasions. Indeed, such information is vital for achieving Target 6 of the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. However, to-date indicators for tracking the environmental impacts of IAS have been either lacking or insufficient. Capitalizing on advances in data availability and impact assessment protocols, we developed environmental impact indicators to track realized and potential impacts of IAS. We also developed an information status indicator to assess the adequacy of the data underlying the impact indicators. We used data on 75 naturalized amphibians from 82 countries to demonstrate the indicators at a global scale. The information status indicator shows variation in the reliability of the data and highlights areas where absence of impact should be interpreted with caution. Impact indicators show that growth in potential impacts are dominated by predatory species, while potential impacts from both predation and disease transmission are distributed worldwide. Using open access data, the indicators are reproducible and adaptable across scales and taxa and can be used to assess global trends and distributions of IAS, assisting authorities in prioritizing control efforts and identifying areas at risk of future invasions. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Ecological novelty and planetary stewardship: biodiversity dynamics in a transforming biosphere’.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marie Vestergaard Henriksen
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
Eduardo Arlé
Tel Aviv University
Arman Pili
University of Potsdam
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Monash University
Tel Aviv University
University of Vienna
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Henriksen et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e701efb6db64358767b864 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0323