Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This paper describes approaches to improving student performance in capstone design based on the idea of students teaching and learning from each other. Student attitudes about teaching and learning from peers are explored, along with the relative importance of factors highlighted in the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) of intrinsic motivation- autonomy, mastery and relatedness (i.e., feeling a connection to a larger group). The first approach described is the use of capstone design projects with explicit educational objectives to enhance the hands-on experience of younger university students. Successes and lessons learned are reported from a capstone design project whose scope included development of four Arduino rover lab activities for a freshman class. The second approach described involves having all capstone seniors complete an individual assignment to document a specific "tool for student success" that might be useful for a future team. Senior surveys indicated support for this idea and confirmed that future students may benefit from this transition of knowledge across future classes. Both experience and survey results suggest that seniors have an innate appreciation for the importance of improving the undergraduate learning experience, and are well positioned to identity any gaps in the curriculum needed for success in capstone design. These two approaches provide a unique opportunity for engineering students participating in capstone design to take an active role in future learning at their university. The third approach was to introduce an open-ended group project called "Teams Teaching Engineering" to a first-year introductory engineering class to give younger students experience with team design activities and to increase their comfort with the idea of teaching others. It is believed that activities focused on students teaching and learning from each other can promote intrinsic motivation if framed to consider student needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Kimberly Demoret (Tue,) studied this question.