Collaboration among non-profits takes multiple forms that vary in structure, governance, and duration. This article develops a typology distinguishing between informal networks, formal alliances, cross-sector partnerships, and temporal arrangements. Drawing on historical and contemporary examples, it analyses how each form enables resource sharing, advocacy, and legitimacy-building while introducing distinct trade-offs. Informal networks foster agility and solidarity but struggle with sustainability; formal alliances enhance scale and stability but risk centralization; cross-sector partnerships open access to power but may compromise independence. Short-term coalitions offer flexibility, whereas long-term federations provide continuity at the cost of adaptability. Through this comparative framework, the article contributes to understanding how collaborative structures influence NGO resilience, accountability, and strategic effectiveness in complex and evolving environments.
Anna Neya Kazanskaia (Wed,) studied this question.