Unsupervised framework improves noise suppression in low-light images, suggesting practical use for image restoration.
Low-light image enhancement (LLIE) remains a challenging task due to the scarcity of paired training data and the complex signal-dependent noise inherent in low-light scenes. To address these issues, this paper proposes a fully unsupervised framework named Wavelet-Guided Zero-Reference Diffusion (WZD) for natural low-light image restoration. WZD leverages an ImageNet-pre-trained diffusion prior and a multi-scale representation of the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) to restore natural illumination from a single dark image. Specifically, the input low-light image is first processed by a Practical Exposure Corrector (PEC) to provide an initial robust luminance baseline. It is then converted from the RGB to the YCbCr color space. The Y channels of the input image and the current diffusion estimate are decomposed into four orthogonal sub-bands—LL, LH, HL, and HH—and fused via learnable, step-wise weights while preserving structural integrity. An exposure control loss and a detail consistency loss are jointly employed to suppress over/under-exposure and preserve high-frequency details. Unlike recent approaches that rely on complex supervised training or lack physical guidance, our method integrates wavelet guidance with a zero-reference learning framework, incorporates the PEC module as a physical prior, and achieves significant improvements in detail preservation and noise suppression without requiring paired training data. Comprehensive experiments on the LOL-v1, LOL-v2, and LSRW datasets demonstrate that WZD achieves a superior or competitive performance, surpassing all referenced unsupervised methods. Ablation studies confirm the critical roles of the PEC prior, YCbCr conversion, wavelet-guided fusion, and the joint loss function. WZD also enhances the performance of downstream tasks, verifying its practical value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: