Key result
MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM predict higher mortality and rehospitalization risk in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Residual congestion is associated with high rehospitalization rates in acute heart failure, prompting evaluation of adrenomedullin (MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM) as a prognostic marker of tissue congestion.
Are adrenomedullin levels (MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM) associated with adverse clinical outcomes in acute heart failure patients?
Are adrenomedullin levels (MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM) associated with adverse clinical outcomes in acute heart failure patients?
MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM are reliable prognostic markers for mortality and rehospitalization in acute heart failure patients.
Bio-ADM at discharge better predicts mortality than admission in acute HF; reinforces consensus on adrenomedullin biomarkers for risk stratification.
Introduction: Residual congestion is associated with a high rehospitalization rate in acute heart failure (HF) patients. This study aims to evaluate the role of adrenomedullin (MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM) as a prognostic marker of tissue congestion with clinical outcomes in acute heart failure patients. Methods: Three databases were systematically searched until November 2024 to include both observational and post hoc clinical trial studies that suit the research question. Outcomes assessed are clinical outcomes of in-hospital mortality, composite outcome of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and heart failure rehospitalization. Statistical analyses conducted are pooled hazard ratio, correlation coefficient, and area under the curve (AUC) with a random effect model. Results: Twenty-one studies of 18,110 patients with low to medium risk of bias are included of which 20 of them are prospective cohort studies. Both MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM measured at admission or discharge are associated with a statistically significant increasing risk of composite outcome, MACE outcome, and all-cause mortality (HR 1.17 – 2.72,). MR-pro ADM is also associated with a statistically significant increasing risk of in-hospital mortality and HF rehospitalization (HR 1.72 – 2.20). Bio-ADM measured at discharge is found to have a better prognostic value for all-cause mortality outcome than bio-ADM measured at admission (HR 1.90 and 1.17, respectively, p 0.007). MR-pro ADM showed a strong and moderate linear correlation with bio-ADM and NT-pro BNP (R 0.784, 0.461, respectively). Conclusion: MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM are both reliable prognostic markers in acute heart failure patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question. Both MR-pro ADM and bio-ADM are reliable prognostic markers for increased risk of mortality and rehospitalization in acute heart failure patients (HR 1.17 – 2.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: