This paper explores a geometric interpretation of the fine-structure constant based on a recursive, relational tetrahedral–octahedral lattice referred to as the Honeycomb Unit (HU). The HU is defined as a regular tetrahedron decomposed via midpoint truncation into four half-sized tetrahedra and one implicit central regular octahedron, yielding a self-similar 10-node relational structure (4 tetrahedral nodes and 6 octahedral nodes). Repeated inward and outward recursion of this unit generates a scale-invariant tetrahedral–octahedral honeycomb that tessellates three-dimensional space without gaps or overlaps. Within this framework, two closely related geometric approximations to the fine-structure constant are examined: α ≈ √2 / 120φ and the algebraically equivalent form α ≈ (√10 - √2) / 240 Rather than being treated as numerological coincidences, these expressions are interpreted as encoding distinct but complementary aspects of the same underlying geometry: a local tetrahedral excitation scale and a global combinatorial node measure associated with the HU. The paper emphasizes the role of relational geometry, node counting, and exact volumetric symmetries (including the 4:1 tetrahedron–octahedron volume equivalence) in motivating these expressions. The work does not claim a derivation of the fine-structure constant from established quantum electrodynamics, nor does it propose a replacement for the Standard Model. Instead, it presents the Honeycomb Unit as a mathematically rigid geometric primitive that may serve as a useful toy model for investigating how dimensionless physical constants could emerge from discrete, self-similar spacetime structures. The results are intended as a conceptual and structural contribution to ongoing discussions in quantum gravity, discrete spacetime models, and the geometric origins of physical constants. v1
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
R. D. Howard
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
R. D. Howard (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/698434cff1d9ada3c1fb370a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18454679