Key result
Perioperative beta blockers reduce post-op AFib by ~51% and lower SVT in cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
Data supporting the routine initiation or continuation of beta blockers before and after cardiac surgery remain unclear.
Does perioperative beta blocker therapy reduce post-operative arrhythmias, mortality, and cerebrovascular accidents in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Does perioperative beta blocker therapy reduce post-operative arrhythmias, mortality, and cerebrovascular accidents in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?
Perioperative beta-blocker use in cardiac surgery significantly reduces the risk of post-operative atrial fibrillation and supraventricular tachycardia.
Supports perioperative beta blockers to prevent post-op AFib in cardiac surgery; extends limited prior evidence in this setting.
Background Although there is abundant literature supporting the clinical utility of beta blocker initiation before non-cardiac surgery in high-risk patient populations, data supporting the routine initiation or continuation of beta blockers before and after cardiac surgery remains unclear. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the use of peri-operative beta-blockers in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and evaluate clinical outcomes such as rates of postoperative arrhythmias, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and in-hospital and all-cause mortality. Methods A literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, identifying studies that evaluated the association of pre-operative initiation and continuation of beta-blocker with clinical endpoints in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The endpoints of interest included development of post-operative atrial fibrillation (AFib), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality, and CVA. Results 19 studies with 3749 patients (2018 treated with beta blockers, 1731 not treated with beta blockers) met inclusion criteria. The average follow-up duration was 12 days (ranging from 1 day to 90 days), the mean age was 63.4 years, 70% were men. Cardiac surgeries including coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, and mitral valve replacement. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, perioperative use of beta blockers was associated with a significantly lower risk of post-op AFib (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.78; P<0.01). Subgroup analysis shows this association was primarily with use of IV Landiolol and with a non-statistically significant trend toward lower risk of AFib in patients initiated or maintained on oral beta blockers (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20-0.41; p<0.01; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.33-1.16; P=0.06). There was a statistically significantly lower risk of developing SVT after cardiac surgery in patients treated with beta-blockers (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.86, P=0.02). The association between beta blocker use and other clinical endpoints including the risk of CVA, in-hospital mortality, and all-cause mortality were not statistically significant, however there was a trend toward lower risk of both in-hospital and all-cause mortality in patients who were treated with beta-blockers compared to those who were not (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16-1.36; P=0.16; OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.17-1.47; P=0.21). Discussion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that in patients who are undergoing cardiac surgery, preoperative initiation of beta-blockers, particularly IV Landilol, or continuation of chronic beta-blockers is associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, particularly post-operative AFib and SVT. The use of beta-blockers may also be associated with a mortality benefit, however additional high-quality studies with extended follow-up time and monitoring are needed to fully elucidate this association.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripathi et al. (2025) studied this question. Perioperative beta blockers in cardiac surgery reduce post-op AFib by 51% (OR 0.49) and SVT by 55% (OR 0.45), with non-significant trends toward lower mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: