The Structure of Meaning offers a concise, discipline‑neutral account of how meaning arises, moves, and stabilizes within relational systems. Rather than treating meaning as a property of words, symbols, or mental states, this paper frames meaning as an orientation‑dependent relation between a structure, an interpreter, and a context that constrains possible interpretations.The paper develops a structural model in which meaning emerges from differences, asymmetries, and relevance; occupies a region of a multi‑dimensional manifold; and shifts dynamically as orientation and context change. Misunderstanding is reframed as a divergence of orientation rather than a disagreement about content, and communication is described as the process of collapsing a region of the meaning‑manifold into a shared local interpretation.This framework provides a clear foundation for further work in cognition, communication theory, relational systems, orientation psychology, AI alignment, and conflict resolution. It also serves as a conceptual hinge for a broader research program on structure, interpretation, and the dynamics of understanding.
Denis Bailey (Wed,) studied this question.