This article argues that Ottoman economic and business history can serve Islamic economics not merely as a source of illustration or normative affirmation, but as a historically grounded analytical setting capable of informing theory-building, mechanism specification, and research design. Although Ottoman practices are frequently referenced in Islamic economics, they are typically invoked episodically and at illustrative or thematic levels, rather than being mobilized to sharpen concepts, explain institutional mechanisms, or guide empirical inquiry. Building on thematic and institutional approaches in Ottoman economic historiography, the article synthesizes seven core domains, markets and regulation, state-market relations, entrepreneurship and commercial networks, guild organization, finance and credit practices, waqf-based provisioning, and legal-institutional pluralism, and demonstrates how each can be translated into analytically usable components for Islamic economics. Rather than attributing economic outcomes to religious doctrine, the article adopts a non-essentialist institutional perspective in which historical trajectories emerge from contingent interactions among legal forms, enforcement arenas, political authority, and organizational complements. This study presents a proposed methodological research framework for systematically classifying 38 publications (n=38) related to the Ottoman period in the literature on Islamic economics. The article develops testable hypotheses to examine the practical application of Islamic norms and demonstrates how historical sources such as Sharia court records and waqf deeds can be used in this process. By rethinking the Ottoman experience as a robust empirical context, the study aims to deepen the field’s analytical depth and institutional foundations.
Üzeyir Serdar Serdaroğlu (Thu,) studied this question.