Mechanical ventilation contributes to lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome, yet whether cumulative mechanical energy, the time-integrated delivery of ventilatory power, adequately reflects the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) remains uncertain. Because lung tissue exhibits nonlinear stress–strain behaviour, the rate and amplitude of energy delivered may be as relevant as its magnitude. We tested whether different combinations of tidal volume (VT) and ventilation duration, matched for cumulative energy, produce distinct patterns of VILI following endotoxin-induced lung damage in male Wistar rats. Animals received intratracheal lipopolysaccharide and, after 24 h, were mechanically ventilated (PEEP=3 cmH₂O; inspired oxygen fraction=0.40) using one of three strategies: VT=6 mL/kg for 150 min (LVT–HMV), VT=9 mL/kg for 100 min (MVT–MMV), or VT=12 mL/kg for 75 min (HVT–LMV). Apparatus dead space was adjusted to maintain normocapnia. An LPS-exposed, non-ventilated group served as molecular and histological reference. Despite equivalent cumulative energy exposure, HVT–LMV resulted in higher plateau and driving pressures, greater alveolar overdistension, collapse, and pulmonary edema, and increased expression of interleukin-6 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. MVT–MMV produced intermediate structural injury with selective upregulation of mechanosensitive extracellular matrix markers, whereas LVT–HMV was associated with the least injury. Driving and plateau pressures correlated with indices of overdistension and extracellular matrix signaling but showed weaker associations with endothelial activation. These findings indicate that VILI depends not only on total energy delivery but also on its temporal distribution, and that cumulative energy alone is insufficient to predict lung injury risk.
Magalhães et al. (Tue,) studied this question.