What are the incidence, predictors, and clinical impacts of major bleeding following left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation?
1,833 patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation who underwent attempted left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) implantation in the Amulet IDE trial. Mean age 75.8 years, 57.7% male.
Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using Amulet or Watchman devices (pooled analysis)
Patients without major bleeding (BARC score <3) after LAAO
Incidence, predictors, management, and clinical outcomes of major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] score ≥3: overt bleeding with transfusion and ≥3 g/dL hemoglobin drop) over 5 yearssafety
Major bleeding after left atrial appendage occlusion is common, peaks in the first 6 months, and is strongly associated with increased risks of stroke and mortality.
Importance Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is used in patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation, who are at increased risk for major bleeding (MB). Objective To evaluate the incidence, predictors, management, and clinical outcomes of MB after LAAO in the Amulet IDE trial. Design, Setting, and Participants The randomized clinical Amulet IDE trial enrolled patients from 2016 through 2019 with 5-year follow-up. Procedures were performed at specialized LAAO centers. Of 1878 randomized patients (1:1 Amulet vs Watchman), 1833 underwent attempted LAAO implantation. These data were analyzed from May 2025 through November 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures Pooled (Amulet and Watchman) patients with vs without MB (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium BARC score ≥3: overt bleeding with transfusion and ≥3 g/dL hemoglobin drop) were compared. Results This study included a total of 1833 patients (57.7% male and 42.3% female; mean SD age, 75.8 7.5 years). MB occurred in 331 patients (18.1%) over 5 years (annualized rate 5.9% per year). Patients with MB were older (76.8 vs 74.7 years) and had higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc (4.8 vs 4.6) and HAS-BLED (3.4 vs 3.2) scores, as well as greater prevalence of diabetes (38.7% vs 34.1%), prior MB (45.3% vs 28.0%), and kidney disease (9.4% vs 4.5%). MB risk was highest in the first 6 months after LAAO (20.5% per year), then decreased to 3.9% per year through 5 years. Most MB events were nonprocedural (88.8%) with gastrointestinal bleeding accounting for 252 of 438 events. Independent predictors of MB included increasing age (hazard ratio HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06), female sex (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56), diabetes (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.58), prior MB (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.55-2.40), and kidney disease (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.48, 3.12). At first MB event, 47.1% of patients were not receiving antithrombotic therapy and 92 patients had recurrent events. Patients with MB had significantly higher rates of the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular death (32.5% vs 18.0%; P lt; .001), driven by higher stroke (14.7% vs 6.6%) and cardiovascular death (24.4% vs 12.9%) rates. All-cause mortality was also higher (49.2% vs 25.4%; P lt; .001). MB was fatal (BARC score of 5) in 25 patients (1.4%). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, MB was common in this high-risk population and largely related to underlying patient factors. Early MB risk was highest 6 months post-LAAO, then dropped considerably. Most events were gastrointestinal and occurred even in patients on minimal or no antithrombotic therapy. MB after LAAO was strongly associated with increased stroke and mortality. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02879448
“First, you have a relatively low annualized stroke rate of 1.5%-3% per year but nearly a 6% annualized rate of major bleeding. Patients who had MB clearly did worse in all aspects, including stroke, CV death, all-cause death. What this tells me is that we should definitely have a trial in older sick patients with high bleeding risk of LAAO vs no antithrombotic.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Boris Schmidt
Stephan Windecker
David Thaler
JAMA Cardiology
Mayo Clinic
University of Bern
Tufts Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schmidt et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69c620d515a0a509bde1973e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2026.0336
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: