Observational study evaluates survival and tissue maintenance of implants in the maxilla, suggesting favorable outcomes.
This prospective, single-arm observational cohort study evaluated 6-year outcomes of inverted body-shift implants placed in the maxillary esthetic zone. Twenty-six patients received twenty-six implants (19 immediate placements, 7 in healed ridges). Buccal grafting was performed in twenty sites (12 xenograft, 8 allograft) and omitted in six. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning were used to measure buccal-bone thickness and soft-tissue stability at baseline, 18-24 months, and 74-84 months. All implants survived (100%) at a mean follow-up of 80.0 ± 6.7 months, and no major complications were reported. Mean labial plate remodeling after six years was -0.27 mm (L1) and -0.37 mm (L2). Pink Esthetic Scores (PES) averaged 12.8, with 15 implants scoring >13. Within the limitations of this small, uncontrolled cohort and descriptive design, these findings suggest favorable long-term survival and maintenance of hard- and soft-tissue contours associated with inverted body-shift implants placed in the anterior maxilla. However, causal inferences and claims of superior or definitive long-term stability should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in larger controlled comparative studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Östman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: