Routine IVUS-guided PCI was not associated with a lower risk of target-vessel failure compared to angiography-guided PCI (13.9% vs 11.1%; HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.97-1.60; P=0.08).
RCT
randomized
open-label
Yes
Does routine IVUS-guided PCI reduce target-vessel failure compared to angiography-guided PCI in patients undergoing complex high-risk PCI?
2020 patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mean age 69 years, 79.4% men, 27.4% presenting with acute coronary syndrome, international.
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI performed with the use of prespecified stent-optimization criteria
Angiography-guided PCI
Target-vessel failure, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization at a median follow-up of 19.0 monthscomposite
Routine IVUS-guided PCI did not significantly reduce the risk of target-vessel failure compared to angiography-guided PCI in patients undergoing complex high-risk PCI.
BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with increased stent optimization and reduced adverse events among patients with complex coronary-artery lesions, but adoption of this strategy in Western countries remains low. Although practice guidelines recommend intracoronary imaging for anatomically complex lesions, evidence from current European practice is limited. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, international, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients undergoing complex PCI to either IVUS-guided PCI, performed with the use of prespecified stent-optimization criteria, or angiography-guided PCI. The primary end point was target-vessel failure, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Of the 2020 patients who underwent randomization, 1010 in the IVUS-guided PCI group and 1009 in the angiography-guided PCI group were included in the primary analysis. The mean age of the patients was 69 years, 79.4% were men, and 27.4% presented with an acute coronary syndrome. The mean procedure duration was 88.8 minutes with IVUS-guided PCI and 66.2 minutes with angiography-guided PCI. Dilation with balloon angioplasty after stent implantation was performed in 91.3% of the IVUS-guided PCI procedures and in 84.5% of the angiography-guided PCI procedures. At a median follow-up of 19.0 months (interquartile range, 15.2 to 23.4), target-vessel failure had occurred in 140 patients (13.9%) in the IVUS-guided PCI group and in 112 patients (11.1%) in the angiography-guided PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.60; P = 0.08). Procedural complications occurred in 11.3% of the IVUS-guided PCI procedures and in 10.2% of the angiography-guided PCI procedures. The frequency of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing complex high-risk PCI, a strategy of routine IVUS-guided PCI performed with the use of prespecified stent-optimization criteria was not associated with a lower risk of target-vessel failure than angiography-guided PCI alone. (Funded by Boston Scientific; IVUS-CHIP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04854070.).
“We have yet to fully establish how to leverage the unique information provided by intravascular imaging to guide both the indications for and the execution of PCI in a way that justifies the associated increase in procedural complexity and cost.”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Roberto Diletti
Joost Daemen
Benjamin Faurie
New England Journal of Medicine
University of Oxford
KU Leuven
Radboud University Nijmegen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Diletti et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Complex coronary-artery lesions (n=2,020). IVUS-guided PCI vs. Angiography-guided PCI was evaluated on Target-vessel failure (composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization) (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.60, p=0.08). Routine IVUS-guided PCI was not associated with a lower risk of target-vessel failure compared to angiography-guided PCI (13.9% vs 11.1%; HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.97-1.60; P=0.08).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb55116edfba7beb87420 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2601521
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: