PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Structural Control and Health Monitoring5 citationsOpen Access

Review of Digital Twin in Structural Dynamics to Improve Condition Monitoring

View Full Paper
SASolomon Alemneh AdimassAŻArkadiusz Żak

Key Points

  • The aim is to overview digital twin methodologies for enhancing condition monitoring in structural dynamics.
  • Conducted a structured review of digital twin methodologies in condition monitoring.
  • Examined applications in critical infrastructure like bridges, offshore platforms, and aerospace systems.
  • Identified challenges in implementing large-scale digital twins, including data integration and cybersecurity.
  • Highlighted improved predictive accuracy for AI-enhanced digital twins in controlled settings.
  • Noted limited field validation and challenges in long-term performance support.
  • Concluded with recognition of data dependence and non-standardized benchmarking issues in digital twin frameworks.

Abstract

Digital twins (DTs) are increasingly investigated for condition monitoring (CM), with validation reported primarily in numerical, laboratory and limited pilot studies. Conventional structural health monitoring (SHM) methods offer limited flexibility and predictive capability, with delayed insights reported in many infrastructure applications. DTs are commonly defined as frameworks that update virtual replicas using continuous data streams. This review presents a structured overview of current DT methodologies and their reported applications in structural CM within structural dynamics. The review focuses on critical infrastructure, including bridges, offshore platforms and aerospace systems. It also identifies challenges in large‐scale DT implementation, including computational demands, data integration complexity and cybersecurity concerns. When multiple environmental and operational hazards interact, response‐based condition inference can become nonunique and ambiguous. Several studies report improved predictive accuracy for selected AI‐enhanced DT frameworks under controlled numerical and laboratory conditions, while long‐term field validation remains scarce. Evidence supporting sustained large‐scale or long‐term field performance remains limited. The review synthesises reported developments in AI‐enabled DTs for structural dynamics and distinguishes demonstrated performance from conceptual or proposed benefits. It highlights reported capabilities and limitations, including data dependence, limited generalisability and the absence of standardised benchmarking frameworks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adimass et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5d9f5a333a821460b770https://doi.org/10.1155/stc/2777297
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper