This study frames next-day ETF market behavior as a binary regime classification problem—distinguishing between “oscillating” days, on which intraday price movements remain within a defined threshold, and “trending” days, on which movements exceed that threshold. This framing is economically motivated: active traders employing Martingale-style strategies and ETF options traders require precisely this type of regime prediction to manage risk and time positions. Using 25 years of daily data (2000–2024) for four major ETFs—IWM (Russell 2000), SPY (S movements exceeding these levels constitute trending behavior. At the 0.5% threshold—the most practically relevant given typical ETF transaction costs—Neural Networks outperform a naive classifier by 13.4% for IWM, 15.4% for SPY, 4.7% for QQQ, and 3.2% for DIA. AUC values exceed 0.5 in most configurations, with stronger discrimination observed for SPY (AUC up to 0.74) and IWM (AUC up to 0.59) than for QQQ and DIA at some thresholds. Results are stronger for some ETFs and thresholds than others, and cases where AUC approaches 0.5 are explicitly acknowledged as reflecting limited discriminatory power.
SeyedSoroosh Azizi (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: