Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVViewpointNEXTSome Good Reasons to Ban ECx and Related Concepts in EcotoxicologyTjalling Jager*View Author Information Department of Theoretical Biology, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsE-mail: email protected; URL: www.debtox.info.Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 19, 8180–8181Publication Date (Web):September 15, 2011Publication History Published online15 September 2011Published inissue 1 October 2011https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es2030559https://doi.org/10.1021/es2030559newsACS PublicationsCopyright © 2011 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views1910Altmetric-Citations60LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (1 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Ecotoxicology,Environmental modeling,Mathematical methods,Risk assessment,Toxicity Get e-Alerts
Tjalling Jager (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: