Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental implementation of the surface code will be a significant milestone for quantum computing. We develop a circuit and a decoder targeted for near-term implementation of a distance-3 surface code. We simulate the code under amplitude and phase damping and compare the threshold to a Pauli-twirl approximation. We find that the approximation yields a pessimistic threshold estimate. From numerical Monte Carlo simulations, we identify the gate and measurement speeds required to achieve reliable error correction. For superconductor devices, a qubit encoded in a 17-qubit surface code demonstrates a lower error rate than an unencoded qubit assuming gate times of 5--40 ns and T₁ times of at least 1--2 μs. If T₁≥10 ns, the difference is significant and can be experimentally measured, allowing near-term implementation and verification of a small surface code. For ion trap devices, gates times of 1 μs and T₁≥40 ms admit measurable differences in error rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomita et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: