This paper places admissibility under physical and mortal pressure. Its task is not to complete physics, solve nonlocality, or settle the theory of time, but to determine whether admissibility can remain speakable as the candidate core object within the TII Framework once failure would matter in high-value phenomena. The paper selects three trial zones—nonlocality, irreversible record, and observer-level temporal readout—not as illustrative examples, but as regions in which the framework must risk explicit loss rather than rely on internal elegance or interpretive elasticity. Rejection clauses are formulated for each zone and gathered into a common rejection architecture under mortal pressure. Survival in these zones is treated as weaker than confirmation and stronger than continued safety. What the paper secures, if anything, is not explanatory completion, but the transition from formal and geometric seriousness to disciplined vulnerability under physically meaningful failure conditions.
Zhaoxun Yun (Thu,) studied this question.