Why the study?
Does Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) have lower variability in valve regurgitation quantitation compared to Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)?
Does Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) have lower variability in valve regurgitation quantitation compared to Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)?
CMR may be superior to TTE for serial measurements of aortic regurgitation volume due to lower variability, but both modalities show variability in mitral regurgitation quantitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR may reduce variability in serial aortic regurgitation quantification; leaves open preferred modality for mitral regurgitation and requires prospective validation.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cawley et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: